for me, 249 for sure... historically correct and unique...

Posted by John in NJ
December 28, 2006 - 05:50AM cet
IP : 141.153.145.168
Email : john@akuta.net

Back to Forum <0 id="/forums/watchesforum-8-1.htmlSearch">Back to Search Follow up View Thread (0)

In terms of wrist size?

Well if the 217 is ok, then I think a 249 should be ok too.

 

Back to Forum <0 id="/forums/watchesforum-8-1.htmlSearch">Back to Search Follow up View Thread (0)